نیکپا اولین مدال تاریخ افغانستان را برد

Stop the tragedies

Kidnapped Afghan deminers should be immediately released

Friday 22 August 2008

The International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL) today condemned the recent kidnapping of a group of Afghan deminers and called for the immediate release of the six men still being held captive.


Thirteen men working for the Afghan demining organization MDC (an ICBL member) – including 11 deminers and two drivers – were abducted by unidentified forces on 19 August in Gardez province. Seven of them have been since released, but the fate of the remaining six remains unknown.

“Deminers put their lives at risk every day to ensure the safety of their communities. Attacking them is a cowardly act and an assault on the entire civilian population,” said Sylvie Brigot, Executive Director of the ICBL, calling on all armed actors to halt attacks on demining personnel and to safeguard their life-saving work. The ICBL also called for the Afghan government to take urgent measures to ensure the security of deminers and to identify and bring to justice those responsible.

“Mine clearance is crucial to allow reconstruction, economic recovery, and build lasting peace. Deminers and their work should be valued and protected,” said Firoz Ali Alizada, ICBL Treaty Implementation Officer, stressing that attacks on deminers could seriously endanger the progress of vital clearance operations

.
Unfortunately, attacks on deminers are not infrequent in Afghanistan. In March 2008, in two separate incidents, seven mine clearance personnel were killed and another seven injured. In 2007, at least six deminers were killed and a further 17 were kidnapped before being released.
One of the most severely mine-affected countries, Afghanistan has the world’s largest demining programme, employing some 8,000 national staff.

For more information on the landmine situation in Afghanistan, which joined the Mine Ban Treaty in 2003, please see the Landmine Monitor Report at
http://www.icbl.org/lm/2007/afghanistan

Exclusion to Inclusion

ICBL Statement on Survivor Inclusion
Standing Committee on Victim Assistance and Socio-Economic Reintegration
Geneva, 3 June 2008
Delivered by Firoz Ali Alizada, ICBL

Co-chairs, colleagues, friends,
Thank you for giving the ICBL another opportunity to speak.
[Jesus Martinez, landmine survivor and director of Survivor Corps-El Salvador] has already
asked you many important questions, but, allow me to ask another one.
Could the landmine survivors and other persons with disabilities on government delegations
please raise their hands or stand up?
…
Thank you!
Could the other landmine survivors and people with disabilities now also stand up or raise
their hands?
…
Let me tell you why I asked you this:
As we are starting to prepare for the Second Review Conference, it is the right time to look
back at the commitments we made at the Nairobi Summit in 2004.
There, we, the survivors, pledged to bring our concerns to the Meetings of States Parties and
intersessional meetings. Well, we have a concern: What are all the States Parties doing to
“ensure the effective integration of mine victims in the work of the Convention?”
Of course, this commitment means much more than having a survivor sitting next to you in
this room.
1. To implement plans and policies that will change OUR lives, YOU need to know what we
find most important. Many of you have spoken about assessments, have you involved us in
carrying out these assessments? Use the expertise from our daily life as a person with a
disability AND from the work we do. After all, we live in our affected, often rural,
communities. We know the effect of the prejudices against people like us. I will give you an
example from my own experience: [example from Firoz' experience]
2. Many of you have spoken about strategic plans, but have you included us in making these
plans? Let us offer you our expertise to be actively involved in the design, implementation
and monitoring of the efforts that are undertaken to assist us. We are NOT JUST
BENEFICIARIES. We are productive contributors to society. The reality we see can make
your objectives SMART-er. [Example from Firoz' experience]
I do not only speak for myself, all my disabled colleagues in the room run their own programs
or organizations. We might not have all the right training or diplomas, but does that mean we
do not have the right skills or cannot be trained?
Actually, we can complement your work in many ways:
• Our presence in your offices will open the door for many people like us who might
confide more in people like themselves.
• We can lead by example and inspire others like us to get involved.
• When we exchange information regularly and as equal partners we will understand
your constraints better and you will understand our demands better. So that we can
find the most effective solution together.
• We come up with practical solutions and identify issues others might overlook.
Yesterday, my colleagues and I were discussing the UN Convention on the Rights of
Persons with Disabilities where 50 percent of the government delegates were persons
with a disability. Thanks to them the concepts of peer support and of the importance of
sports and recreation were included in the treaty.
3. When you see our expertise and added value, who will be the most effective advocates to
promote the universalization and implementation of the Mine Ban Treaty at national, regional
or international meetings? We will come here as equal partners. [Example from Firoz'
experience]
I want to conclude by saying we are not asking for something extraordinary. I have already
mentioned the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. But the principle of
“nothing about us without us” has also been taken to heart by those of you negotiating the
cluster munitions treaty. 111 states have accepted to “Closely consult with and actively
involve cluster munition victims and their representative organisations” as an obligation in
this new treaty. Many of these 111 states are here.
So, why not start right here, right now?
Identify people for your delegations. Ask donors states or organizations to assist you in
getting these people in your own offices and to these meetings. Approach the people you saw
standing up at the back of this room and build partnerships.
We are ready, are you too?

Firoz ALIAZADA in Japan in 2003

Photos and Memories

Firoz ALIZADA during an official meeting in Washington D.C, USA in April 2008

معلولیت و افغانستان

معلولیت منحیث یک پدیده اجتماعی مشکل حاد وقابل اندیشه جامعه بشری بوده که بنابر عوامل متعدداز جمله امراض مختلف ووقوع حوادث گوناگون طبعی وغیرطبعی ،در گیری های مسلحانه و هکذاعدم پالیسی های لازم صحی ،وقایوی و حفط الصحوی توأم با محدویت های معین فزیکی ،دماغی ،تنقیص حسی ،حالت مرضی وتکالیف روحی و امثال آن بخصوص در جوامع عقب مانده که دچار فقر اقتصادی ،فرهنگی ، اجتماعی و محیطی است دامنگیر تعدادا ز انسانها میگردد که الی اخرین دقایق زنده گی آنانرا در مشکلات جسمی و حرکی و پرابلمهای کثیری اجتماعی در فعالیت های روزمره شان مواجه میسازد .
به اساس تعریف سازمان صحی جهان بیشتر از %10 تمام نفوذ جهان را اشخاص دارای معلولیت تشکیل میدهد.هرگاه این رقم را اززاویه وسعیتر یعنی بعد اجتماعی واقتصادی عمیق تر مورد غوروبرسی قراردهیم ممکن به این رقم افزوده شود .بهرصورت %10 نفوذ جهان هم رقم بالائی را نشان میدهد ومهمتر از همه اینکه آسیب پذیرترین %10 درکشورهای روبه انکشاف بسرمیبرند.
افغانستان درنتیجه مشکلات عظیم ازجمله دو دهه شرایط دشوار وویران کننده جنگ ،حاکمیت سیاست ها،وپالیسی های صادرشده وبرخاسته از بیرون که هیچگونه مطابقت و همخوانی با شرایط عینی و ذهنی کشور نداشته است بخصوص طی سالهای اخیرمتأسفانه رشدقابل لمس در عرصه های حیات سیاسی و اجتماعی و بخصوص حیات اقتصادی خویش نداشته باوصف موجودیت منابع مستعد انسانی وطبعی از جمله کشور های روبه انکشاف بشمارمیرود .
به اساس سروی ملی معلولیت در افغانستان که به نماینده گی از وزارت محترم شهدا ومعلولین جمهوری اسلامی افغانستان توسط موسسه محترم بین اللملی هندیکپ در سال 2004 شروع و در سال 2005 به اتمام رسید نشان دهنده مشکلات عظیم ووضعیت وخیم برای افراد دارای معلولیت میباشد .به اساس این سروی متذکره فیصدی شیوع معلولیت درکشور از 700000 الی 900000 یعنی به تناسب نفوذ فعلی کشور 2.7 فیصد را نشان میدهد .که این رقم نشان دهنده موجودیت یکتن معلول در هرپنج خانواده َ،که 58.9 فیصد آن نزذ مردان به نسبت سهیم بودن بیشتر شان در پروسه جنگ های بیشتر از دودهه کشور و 41.1 فیصد آن نزد زنان موجود میباشد . به تناسب سن کمترین رقم را در خور سالان یعنی از یکساله تا چهارساله چون اکثریت اطفال دارای معلولیت به نسبت عدم برنامه های مؤثر حمایتی و صحی و فکتورهای متعدد اجتماعی و دیگر حین تولد و یا تا رسیدن به سن چهارسالگی تلف میگردند و بلند ترین رقم را یعنی 26.8 فیصد بزرگسالان یعنی از 35 الی 44 ساله تشکیل میدهد .
البته اگر اندازه شیوع ملی 2.7 فیصد باشد ، مسلماً تعداد افراد دارای از یک ساحه نظر به ساحه دیگر متفاوت میباشند . چنانکه دیده میشود شیوع معلولیت در سه ساحه یعنی ساحه غربی 3.7 ، ساحه شمالی 3.0فیصد و ساحه مرکزی 2.9 فیصد که به تناسب حد اوسط شیوع ملی رقم بالاتر را نشان میدهد و در ساحات شمال غربی 2.6 فیصد ، در ساحات شرقی 1.9 فیصد یعنی کمتر از حد اوسط شیوع ملی و در کندز برابر با حد اوسط شیوع ملی یعنی 2.7 فیصد میباشد.
قابل تذکر است که سطح پوشش خدمات در ساحات مختلف کشور نیز متفاوت بوده در ساحات مرکزی ، شمالی و نواحی شرقی کشور نسبتاً بلند تر بوده ، در حالیکه نواحی جنوبی و جنوبغربی از خدمات محدود مستقید میشوند.
شرایط موجوده و حالات سیاسی ، اجتماعی و اقتصادی کنونی ، بخصوص سه دهه گذشته در کشور تأثیرات ناگواری بالای زنده گی اجتماعی مردم کشور بخصوص قشر آسیب پذیر منجمله افراد دارای معلولیت بجا گذاشته ، فقر ، تنگدستی و عدم اعتماد به آینده را در زنده گی روزمره شان به یک سیر قابل تصور صعود داده است .
جامعه معلولیت و افراد دارای معلولیت با چالش ها و موانع متعدد و مختلف اجتماعی از جمله عمدتاً:
- کمبود و عدم دانش و آگاهی لازم در رابطه به عوامل ، انواع و اشکال معلولیت ، طرق پیشگیری بیشتر این پدیده همراه با بینش ضعیف اجتماع در رابطه .
- اصطلاحات و لسانهای منفی و مبتذل ارائه اشکال معلولیت معادل (دیوانه ، کر ، کور ، لنگ ...) و امثال آن بکار برده میشود .
- معلولیتهائی که از اسباب ولادی ناشی میگردد و بخصوص معلولیت های ذهنی و دماغی ، بالای خانواده ها انگیزه منفی داشته ، مخصوصاً در شرایط ازدواج برای برادران و خواهران عواقب جدی را بمیان میآورد . بناءً خانواده معلولیت را کمتر جلوه داده تا که از شرم و ترس بدنامی بعدی در اجتماع جلوگیری بعمل آورده باشند .
در جنب چالش های متذکره یکی از فکتورهای اساسی دیگر که حیات عادی اجتماعی و اقتصادی افراد دارای معلولیت را متأثر نموده و با موانع جدی مواجه ساخته است ، همانا عدم موجودیت یک چتر قوی حمایوی قانونی ، جهت حمایت از شخصیت حقوقی و اجتماعی آنان از جمله نبود قانون و پالیسی مشخص جهت رسیده گی به حل مشکلات موجوده متناسب به نیازمندیها و توقعات ایشان ، موجودیت یک سلسله موانع قانونی که مانع مشارکت کامل این افراد در روند زنده گی جامعه افغانی میگردد از جمله در عرصه های اموزش و تعلیم و تربیه ، کار و اشتغال،( به اساس سروی هندیکپ بین المللی بلند تر از %60 اشخاص دارای معلولیت بالاتر از هفت سال زمینه مناسب دسترسی به تعلیمات رسمی را ندارند . در حالیکه این حالت در اشخاص ناتوان رقت بار تر بوده %70 را نشان میدهد . ) ، عدم قابلیت های لازم دسترسی به خدمات اجتماعی از جمله
تعلیم و تربیه ، حمایت های صحی و توانبخشی ، کار و ظرفیت سازی ، ناچیز بودن خدمات موجوده اجتماعی با درنظرداشت نیازمندیهای ویژه کتگوریهای مختلف معلولیت ، عدم توجه لازم و پالیسی روشن در سطح دولت و ساختار های آن در عرصه معلولیت ، عدم کارآیی و ظرفیت لازم کاری در سازمانها و نهادهای مدنی افراد دارای معلولیت و هکذا پراگنده گی و ناهمآهنگی فعالیت های آنان ، عدم انسجام و پراگنده گی و مفید و مؤثر خود این افراد ....... و ده ها فکتور دیگر میباشد .
از نظر کارشناسان و متخصصین عرصه معلولیت راه بیرون رفت از مشکلات و حمایت از اشخاص دارای معلولیت و احقاق حقوق حقه انسانی و مدنی و اعاده شخصیت حقوقی و اجتماعی آنان همانا طرح و ایجاد یک چتر قوی حمایوی ، قانونی و حقوقی جهت حمایت از حقوق حقه انسانی و شخصیت حقوقی این افراد از طریق انفاذ قانون جامع افراد دارای معلولیت و پالیسی مربوطه که مسلماً پارلمان کشور میتواند در این عرصه نقش اساسی و تعین کننده را داشته باشد ، همچنان طرح و عملی سازی پلانهای استراتیژیک و درازمدت در سطح کشور که میتواند در چهار مرحله مختلف ، مرحله اول تشویق و تشکیل گروپ های کمک خودی ، مرحله دوم تشکیل شوراهای مشورتی ، مرحله سوم تشکیل و انکشاف انجمن ها و مرحله نهایی تشکیل و انسجام و تشکیل فدراسیون و یا اتحادیه چتر وسیع که تمام تشکیلات مربوط را تحت پوشش قرار داده و هماهنگ اعاده حقوق نماید میباشد . قابل تذکر است که با درنظرداشت طرح متذکره جامعه افراد دارای معلولیت و معلولیت افغانستان درمرحله دوم و قسماً مرحله سوم قرار داشته و مسلماً تشکیلات نوپا که تجربه خاص در این عرصه ندارند به چالش ها و مشکلات مواجه خواهد بود و جهت فایق آمدن به این مشکلات و رسیدن به مراحل بعدی مساعی دولت ، پارلمان کشور و سایر نهادهای مدنی و افراد جامعه امری است ضروری و قابل اهمیت بسزا . و از سویی جهت رسیدن به این مأمول بذل مساعی و مشارکت در ساختار و رشد تدریجی ظرفیت عاملین و یا مجریان عرصه آغاز و به آگاهی و متقاعد ساختن مخاطبین یعنی دولت ، پارلمان و عناصر مختلف جامعه میتواند انجام بپذیرد .

SURVIVORS NEED EQUAL RIGHTS

SURVIVORS NEED EQUAL RIGHTS
REGIONAL CONFERENCE
MINE ACTION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PEACE AND DEVELOPMENT
11-13-March-2007
PHNOM PENH-CAMBODIA
Firoz ALI ALIZADA

People with disabilities or victims have the same rights and dignity as others, but unfortunately due to lack of attention and inadequate available services most of the time the important and vital element which is equability of rights and opportunities has been missing and trampling along the past decades. I have been growing up in Afghanistan a country faced decades of war, violence, economic problem, poverties, drought, lack of health care and many other vast problems… You might think the mentioned problems will be targeting all the population living there, but we have to bear in mind and consider the most vulnerable suffering severely much more than others, WHO ARE THEY? They have been victims and persons with disabilities along the history of human beings, unfortunately!

Of course persons with disabilities never want the rest of population to be maimed by landmines, cluster munitions or anything which harm the civilians. But victims also want to have equal opportunity and their natural dignity safe as human beings.
In order to achieve that, each victim needs five steps of service availability to be able to integrate and lives as others in the society and function as he/she wants to do so:
It starts from providing:
Phase-1: Emergency and continuing medical care (this service can rescue a victim to survive and carry on) but to survive without parts of body or damaged body needs:
Phase-2: Physical rehabilitation (PR can able a person to walk to talk to eat ) but walking, talking and eating will not be useful and helpful in a isolated condition, in order to live in a society he/she needs:
Phase-3: Psychological support and social reintegration (once, the victim psychologically supported he/she can be able to forget the past what ever he/she could do, than victim needs to be socially reintegrated, but you need to follow some more steps to reintegrate him/her, to do so we need to:
Phase-4: Economic reintegration (this steps of service providing is very crucial and meanwhile very much vital, it can change a victim psychologically, socially and even physically) but how will you sustain this system? It is easy if you develop:
Phase-5: Laws and public policies (laws and public policies can grantee the above mentioned steps or better to say only law and polices can grantee the rights of victims or persons with disabilities).

Persons with disabilities have been dreaming and advocating for decades for having a law to grantee their rights, whom finally overcame and developed the International convention on the protection and promotion of the rights and dignity of persons with disabilities which is fortunately approved by UN-General Assembly in last December.
So, it means now we are asking the respectable states very legally to respect the persons with disabilities based on his/her rights as human beings, not based on charities and sympathies. What doest it mean to respect? It means to address and respond to their needs and requirements as soon as you can.
I HOPE SO!

A world Free of Landmines

10th ANNIVERSARY OF MINE BAN TREATY
BRUSSELS - 08-MAY-2007
Firoz Ali ALIZADA

I am Firoz Ali ALIZADA from Afghanistan working for Handicap International in Kabul. I have the pleasure travelling from far away to join Belgium in order to celebrate the 10th anniversary of mine ban treaty.

As billions of people I hate the landmines too, because I am one of the hundreds of thousands survivors, as I lost both legs 11 years ago in Afghanistan.

In the past three decades of war hundreds of thousands children, women and other innocent people in Afghanistan have been maimed by landmines and cluster bombs. This tragedy is not ended yet however there is a huge decrease in causalities from 60 People per day to 60 people per month but still Afghanistan remains one of the highest affected countries by landmines in the world.

As all of you know Afghanistan is post-conflict country which needs to be reconstructed, but existence of mines in many cases prevents and even stops the work of construction and reconstruction, so landmine is not only a threat for human beings it has been a big challenge in the field of development too. For ex: Kabul airport was contaminated by landmines, which could strongly discourage the flight agencies … to fly over Kabul or tourists can not visit many parts of Afghanistan due to landmines’ risks while before of war thousands of tourists were visiting Afghanistan and it was a good income for Afghanistan.

Afghanistan joined the MBT in 2003. More than 140 square km of mine contaminated land was cleared, more than 65.000 mines of stockpiles were destroyed, 1,8 millions of people became aware of mines’ danger through the Mine risk educations programs. Afghanistan as member of MBT very strongly could refuse the mining of Afghanistan-Pakistan border which was planed by Pakistan, If Afghanistan was not a member of MBT it would be difficult to resist against Pakistan's plan, and so the regional and bilateral political impact of MBT has been very positive and constructive as well.

But still there are hundreds of new victims every year with all the others survivors do need adequate assistance, and many contaminated areas by landmines requiring clearance. Afghanistan still has a very long journey to clear the mines and meet the needs of survivors.

10 years ago Mine Ban Treaty opened the windows of hopes; Mine Ban Treaty intends to stop human suffering caused by landmines that so far millions of children, women and other innocent people’s life and livelihoods have been rescued. As Kosal said there are achievements at the result of Mine Ban Treaty but further successes are depend on commitment of states parties and international communities.

We can achieve more if we include mine action and victim assistance in our long term plans, such as national development strategy, poverty reduction strategy paper, and economic development programs. Too often some of the affected countries do not prioritize mine action or wait for full supports from international communities! Affected States must take the responsibility to make it happen!




This is not acceptable to witness human suffering even today, so I call on developed countries to consider these issues seriously and encourage the affected countries by supporting them through sustaining mine action, capacity building of national mine action authorities.

States parties specially affected states by mines must develop national legislation or adapt the existing legislation to make sure the terms of the MBT are Included In the local law, Mines are illegal weapons and using or possessing them must be sanctioned by law.

Victim assistance is one of the components of MBT, it was good to have this component in the treaty but it would be better if it was fully implemented in the field. The critical situation of Afghan victims can prove the inadequate attention of government.

Article 6 of MBT it is says that “every country in a position to do so shall provide victim assistance" for me every country is a position to do something:

So I would like to insist on the following points:
- States affected by mines must assist their own victims via providing:
- Rehabilitation
- Social and economic reintegration services
- And establishment of national coordination body to define and Implement victim assistance plan

- States that are not affected must assist the affected states through providing:
- Financial supports
- Technical supports
- Capacity building of national victim assistance actors

Victims want their rights and dignity to be protected as a human being. Fortunately the new convention for protection of rights and dignity of persons with disabilities approved by general assembly and opened for signature since March 2006 gives a strong hope to persons with disabilities but this hope will not be achieved unless the states do ratify and fully implement it.

Disability Rights Convention (DRC) is a good complement of MBT in terms of assisting victims while in MBT the VA is not a compulsory but the DRC is specifically and obligatory calling on states to protect the rights and dignity of persons with disabilities.

A treaty is only a piece of paper unless the real needs of victims or persons with disabilities are properly addressed and the daily tragedies are ended.

Thank you!

FROM LANDMINE TREATY TO

10TH ANNIVERSARY OF MINE BAN TREATY CELEBRATION
FROM LANDMINE TREATY TO
HUMAN SECURITY
Panel Discussion, Sept 17th 2007
Oslo-Norway

Firoz Ali ALIZADA

Ladies and gentlemen!

25 years ago from now my villagers along with my family members had ran a way from the main road to rescue themselves from attack of soviet invasion, the ruthless soviets without any distinguishing between civilians and militaries butcherly were killing people and burning the livelihoods of everybody, that my family was one of those affected families, who lost all their properties. I was born during that hard period when my family was living in a tiny stony cave, 60 km far from our village on the Tashbig a rocky mountain in Shaikhali District of Parwan Province of Afghanistan to safe them from the invasion storms.

It means I grow up in a country where I have been witnessing the hundreds of different disastrous problem such as: invasion, civil war, door to door conflicts, genocides, domestic violence, the terrible Taliban regime, the terrible international Terrorism, suicide bombings and other natural disasters like: droughts and opium.

In 1996 I stepped on a landmine which was planted on a shortcut way to my school, I lost my legs and wounded my left hand, since then I have been campaigning for the safety of others who have not maimed so far and for the rights of those who affected and victimized by different causes.

In my short period of experience I have learned to encourage the affected and non affected Afghans to raise their voices to stop the on going tragedies and innocent casualties and protect their inherent rights and dignities.


It has been fruitful to campaign against any single disastrous weapons, but at the same time it has been very heavy, costly and time consumer, the inaccurate ammunition banned and will be banned but unfortunately after tremendous tragedies among the civilians. Why the weapons have been testing on civilians? Why the weapons have been testing on poor and developing countries? Who respond to the past tragedies and who is responding to the ongoing one? Indeed who assist the war victims, particularly the landmine and cluster munitions victims?

You all know, Afghanistan passed the nearly 3 decades of dark period, but the consequences of war still very seriously affecting the Afghans: the landmines still maims an average of 60 people per month, the cluster bomblets still maims the people, the armed groups still threat people, the illiteracy rate is extremely high and this problem is still ongoing for example: this year 60000 students applied to study in the universities, but due to lack of capacity of universities of Afghanistan only 20000 of them accepted, the health care services can not respond to the crucial needs of Afghans, the human rights advocates are in danger, the domestic violence is increasingly increasing, discriminations against women and other minorities are existing and hundreds of other challenges which have been hampering the development and human security of afghans and Afghanistan.

Today Afghanistan is not only a post-conflict country, the enemies of Afghanistan, the Taliban and the international terrorists still fight against the government, which highly affects the people, the poppy cultivation is growing up, in one hand affect the Afghans and on the other hand create problems in international relations of Afghanistan and for the humanity.

Today when you walk in Kabul city, you will see the depression on the face and eyes of Afghans, you will see the risks of suicide bombings threaten the Afghans, you will see the poverty which obligates the children to work on the streets and beg money, you will see the hundreds of people waiting under the hot sun but no one give them work to do and so on.

While I agree with the importance of the national security, but to secure the state do not automatically mean securing people, thus I strongly believe human security or individual security is much more important than any other attempts, the individual security can be implied by paving the way for a basic and safe life through provisions of heath care, education and work in a democratic atmosphere, these are the three main elements which could be an efficient way to begin securing the individual rights, beside protecting the individual from any political violations.

I don’t see any point to wait for the next inaccurate weapons and human violations, after thousands of innocent casualties, campaign and advocacy won’t be as effective as it is before the tragedies, the famous proverb says: “prevention is better than cure”

I will not be tired at all to campaign under the slogans of:
No landmine, No cluster munitions, No nuclear, No poverty and No human violations!

Thank you,